I was in
kindergarten when Kennedy was shot. To say that the Kennedys were popular was
an understatement. The two most popular Halloween costumes at the class party
that year, less than a month before JFK was shot, had been John and Bobby
plastic masks. My first inkling that something big had happened was when I got
in the car and the mom who was driving carpool that day said nothing but only
sobbed the drive home.
I heard
Roger Stone do a radio interview on his book and realized I had read little to
nothing on the assassination of John F. Kennedy. I didn't go see the Oliver
Stone film. I found it strange that I've read books on the Viet Nam War and
Watergate - the other two defining political events in my growing up years -
but I had never taken the time to accept or reject the Warren Commission. It's
interesting that in the back of my mind I've sort of known there are two
self-contradictory popular beliefs that guide popular perception on the Kennedy
assassination:
1. the Warren Report is
seriously flawed
2. anyone that presents an
alternative view of the Warren Report is a kook
So who
does Roger Stone - longtime political strategist for Richard Nixon, Ronald
Reagan, George H. Bush, and George W. Bush - say killed JFK? Since he has a
picture of President Lyndon Baines Johnson on the cover and subtitles the book,
The Case Against LBJ, I'm not giving a spoiler to tell you where this book is
going. (Note: Stone is equally hard on Republicans as Democrats; he is an equal
opportunity sledgehammer.)
His
attack on the Warren Report - from his rejection of the "magic
bullet" (the conclusion that the same bullet went completely through
Kennedy's body and then hit Texas Governor John Connelly, breaking his leg), to
the 50+ witnesses present that said there was gunfire from the grassy knoll and
whose testimony was deemed unreliable - was all fascinating.
But what
makes the book sizzle is his depiction of Johnson as a psychopath who had at
least eight men murdered to protect and promote his political career. (The Box
13 incident that got him elected to the Senate in 1946 is just as surreal as
the alleged murders in his wake.) Stone sets out to show how the parties that
would most benefit from Kennedy's death worked together, including the Mob, J.
Edgar Hoover, a few renegades in the CIA tied to the Bay of Pigs and several
failed assassination attempts on Fidel Castro, certain Texas oilmen, and first
and foremost, the man who stood the most to gain and who could organize the
plot and then perform the most important function to hold it all together -
controlling the evidence - namely Lyndon Baines Johnson.
How was
the book? If you can get past the typos of a self-published bestselling outlier,
Stone's writing was fine and propelled you through the pages. It was as or more
titillating than many a political suspense thriller.
Did Stone
make the case against LBJ? Like any argument based on an historical event; you
have to present - and hope the readers / listeners believe - a boatload of
circumstantial evidence, assembled cogently, and wrapped up neatly with a bow
on top. Did I believe him? I think I can confidently say this: Even if
all Stone's assumptions and dot connecting aren't correct, he made an
overwhelming case that the Warren Commission and its report was a sham that was
designed to protect powerful participants in a plot that could not be subsumed
within a lone gunman theory.
Is this
the best book to read if you haven't read anything else about the Kennedy
Assassination? Go back to the two popular beliefs: the Warren Report was flawed
and conspiracy theorists are kooks. An author like Bill O'Reilly tries to make
the case that both of those beliefs are still absolutely true - and that he has
written a groundbreaking book. (And after reading Stone I'm finding Killing
Kennedy decidedly unsatisfactory.) So why not Stone? You'll learn about the
political winds of the day, the dominant views, and an alternative view that
was there from the moment JFK was shot. If it doesn't go down right, there are
a myriad of more traditional primers.
Posts
